Friday, August 30, 2024

About my personal detour lately

Suddenly it's four weeks since my last blog entry... as if nothing is happening either near me or on larger stages. Perhaps that's a good reminder about how easy it is to let the mind (and body) drift, to spend evenings criticizing WNBA officiating, or whatever else is easier than sitting down to write some random thoughts.

Or maybe it's a combination of a trip to Keokuk for a family wedding the first weekend of the month, and our two grandsons flying to spend three days plus with us (unaccompanied!), and four nights of the Democratic National Convention, and quite a few hours editing and adjusting two online college writing courses.

Or maybe it's just the lazy days of late summer.

Or... say, here's something: I am making progress on interviewing for my history of St. Luke's UMC project, which no one asked for and which has no clear end point or product. Yet, for something so vague, it certainly has been entertaining for me.

Yesterday I spent an hour on the phone with a guy who was an intern pastor for less than a year back in 1986-87, spanning the last few weeks of the tenure of the church's founding minister who was losing it to alcoholism plus the arrival of an inspiring young minister who basically restarted the church. Jay Rundell is now nearly 40 years on and works at a seminary in Ohio... but still remembers those days -- a combination of difficult times and nostalgic memories. 

That then-young minister is Bill Selby, now 81, and still living right across the street from St. Luke's. He has studied church systems for many years and heads a center that spreads the word about church philosophies and systems across at least seven states. I have enjoyed sitting in a local Starbucks talking with him, and even remembering to take some notes. Sitting down for an extended interview is a good reminder of how challenging the process can be... and the only thing that has saved me is going back to my computer and trying to reconstruct as much of the conversation as I can without delay. 

Bill's successor, Dick Evans, still lives in Littleton, and we have struck up a friendship that didn't have any time to build back in 2002, when Dick was the lead pastor as Kathleen and I joined the church that fall. He left the post in June of 2003. We have had extended conversations twice this summer, covering everything from how to write and deliver a great sermon to anecdotes about how a church exploded in membership in just a few years. 

After Dick, came Janet Forbes, who led the church for 12 years. She was brought in to provide stable leadership, to get finances in order. and to overcome the latest rumors and feelings of abandonment and more. She was nice enough to invest some time writing down her random memories, plus her strategies and tactics in leading a church. She and her husband were off camping much of the summer, but I plan to sit down with her soon for some follow up questions.

The little history project began with wanting to add some stories and "color" to the 40th anniversary of a church that did not have a building until 1986 and that parallels the community of Highlands Ranch in many ways (the place was a working ranch 45 years ago... there were 87 occupied homes here in 1981). It grew from nothing and there were lots of ups and downs along the way. Like my research?

Back to my lame excuses for neglecting this blog: stuff happened. 

So, along with other responsibilities (so much journalism judging), it's been interesting to have this church history side project. Right now, I am thinking I may need to produce two different versions of whatever  I come up with... perhaps one as an interactive ebook and the other as a printed book. 

But I still have at least a dozen more people to interview to flesh out what I have learned and I still need to gather visuals of all sorts, particularly from before the year 2000, which is the period when there was the most tumult (and the most riveting history, to be honest).

But today my task is to browse PDFs of 71 student newsmagazines entered in the NSPA Pacemaker competition and start separating them into "not winners" and "possible winners." I am leading a team of three who will name finalists and national winners, though we live in three time zones and two of us are active advisers. 

Well, enough with the excuses, which are weak since I spent plenty of time in the past month watching old "Star Trek: The Next Generation" episodes, and the Olympics, and Fever games.

But we are already into Week 2 of the university classes and the unofficial end of summer is here, and I just reactivated by sports package with Infinity so I can get the Big 10 Network... go Hawks!

Time to refocus.

Thursday, August 1, 2024

Ad hominem attacks are logical fallacies... except in politics

My last post was a bit over the top, I suppose, but "over the top" appears to be the new American norm. I would hate to be out of step with the zeitgeist. Someone might start calling me names.

And that is my clunky segue to the very recent trend of Democrats and their social media supporters calling Trump and Vance names. Weird. Odd. Strange. They are, of course, outraged.

Trump is allowed to say whatever he wants by his dazed and confused cult members and he has been a consistent playground bully for, well, his entire life. No need to tinker with success. Vance is newer to name-calling but he's doing his best to antagonize pretty much anyone not already firmly in the cult's embrace. 

Yesterday's National Association of Black Journalists panel at the group's national conference has caused angst among many journalists. Should a respectable group invite someone as antagonist and dishonest as Trump to be part of a conference panel at all? Or should journalists go over and above in their duty to present all "sides," even the side of a convicted felon? These difficult questions cause people to resign leadership positions in protest and cause others to leap to the defense of free expression, with dozens of positions in between.

I honestly don't have an answer but I certainly am delighted by the spectacle of an old white man questioning the racial identification of a Black woman in a room overwhelmingly filled with Black journalists. I assume Trump had his more racist cult members in mind as his true audience yesterday and I also assume that radical social media (including FOX News) will spin his performance as brave. 

For Black voters considering supporting Trump this fall... well, that consideration should be quickly discarded.

I suspect that most Republicans who have even heard of this event experienced the slightest dread... in fact, they might have thought, "How odd. Our candidate didn't even try to answer questions with any policies or facts and seemed intent on taking on anyone not white." Republican politicians, of course, raced to explain away Trump's remarks, many pretending that they would prefer to discuss issues and the history of Kamala Harris's policies. 

The dirty truth is that the Republican Party is no more. It is now the Trump Party or MAGA Party, and we have a major political party that represents explicitly racist views. 

My hope is that the percentage of American racists is not all that large and that reason and hope will prevail in the election, now 98 days away (though voting must start at least a month earlier than that). 

In the meantime, creating silly internet memes that label Trump and Vance as weird and odd seems like a good way to make fun of the bullies. Legions of elementary teachers would object. "Turn the other cheek" is a laudable message, and Michelle Obama famously declared that "when they go low, we go high." The playground must be free of bullying.

Jesus and Michelle are right in the long run, but in the real world there is a need to win elections. Bullies hate to be ridiculed. That's what THEY depend upon in attacking others. 

Trump and Vance and the cult are certainly threats to democracy and American ideals. They could do a lot damage, at least in the near term, if they were to be elected.

But they are also fundamentally silly and weird. They are laughable.

And once people start laughing at you, it's tough to fight back. It would take demonstrating a seriousness of purpose and some actions that SHOW Trump acting for the good of the nation and the world.

Ha! See how easy it is to enjoy a good laugh about Trump and Vance? Mocking terms like "odd" and "weird" are not acceptable in logical arguments. But we are not engaged in creating rhetorically sound arguments. 

I would like to laugh all the way through the election results... and then continue laughing as the Trump cult noisily implodes.