New technology tends to produce a weird combination of excitement and fear. Generative AI is the latest example of this phenomenon.
Some gurus argue that AI will open an unimagined abundance for the world, with humans about to enter a golden age. Anyone not exploring AI is a Luddite.
More gurus are issuing warnings, and it seems wise to at least pay attention to the potential dangers posed by uncontrolled technology (doesn't anyone read Isaac Asimov anymore?).
Yesterday we learned that HHS issued a lengthy report that included a number of non-existent citations, likely due to someone using AI to generate the research. And we aren't surprised since such stories are everywhere and all you need to do to test the software's propensity to simply make things up is to open up ChatGPT and ask it to create a report with formal citations.
In some ways, a robot that lies somewhat regularly is in tune with the times, since we have a president and a large number of his cult members who lie blatantly and shamelessly. The challenge is rapidly becoming finding sources we can trust and strategies we can use to verify accuracy.
But my assumption is that AI will continue to be refined and will produce fewer and fewer errors, though we really don't know exactly how the robot arrives at the answers.
Today there is a report that new college grads are having more trouble getting hired by companies needing programmers because those companies are opting for AI to do the work that traditionally helped train new employees, immerse them into company culture, etc. There are no reports on whether the robots are more accurate than their human counterparts. They probably are at least as good and they demand no creature comforts, annoying pay raises, or even a comfortable chair.
"Deep thinkers" are overwhelmingly alarmed by the combination of rapidly improving AI capabilities and the relative ignorance the "human masters" of the robots possess as to how they "think." Of course, there is fame and money to be made in issuing dire warnings and predicting disaster, so such negative stories outnumber the positive ones. That's the nature of news and social media.
One report predicted that it won't be long until the AI begins to program itself, with no need for pesky humans to oversee the work or place limits on the robots.
Just as the U.S. appears to be blase about the rule of law, common sense, and decency being quickly overtaken by a corrupt, hate-filled Trump administration, we are simultaneously sleep walking through what are the early stages of tech disaster.
I'm just along for the ride, of course, telling myself that judges and various "smart people" in positions of authority will save the day (in the long run) and that the tech giants aren't going to create a system that has no use for the billionaires who are in charge of the robots.
Just as AI appears to often present the "unreal" in its products (hallucinations and lies), so Trump and Republican politicians are content to create their own reality.
An appeals court is apparently taking the next week or so to gather arguments about whether Trump has the right to simply make up a national emergency that justifies using tariffs to protect us from... something.
My guess is that there really IS a national (international?) emergency, but it has nothing to do with a few shady characters entering the country illegally and nothing to do with phony anti-Christian slander.
The emergency is the robots.
Who has control of the "kill switch"?